Unlike Haywood Countyโ€™s other contested municipal election โ€” in Maggie Valley โ€” two incumbents are running for reelection and seek to defend their seats from three challengers.

But those challengers had a tough time making their case for change or demonstrating why aldermen Clayton Davis and Mike Eveland shouldnโ€™t be returned to their posts.

โ€œThey work their behinds off,โ€ said Jasay Ketchum at The Smoky Mountain News candidate forum held Oct. 18 in the Maggie Valley Town Board room. โ€œSome of the things they do, as a person I donโ€™t approve of, but they do it for the best of the town.โ€

As an example, Ketchum cited his opposition to a proposed brunch ordinance thatโ€™s been making the rounds in Western North Carolina governments since it was passed by the General Assembly earlier this year.

โ€œI would vote no, but really I feel like, why canโ€™t they wait two hours? If it was up to me, I would go back to blue Sundays,โ€ Ketchum said, of the era when alcohol sales were prohibited altogether on Sundays. โ€œSunday is the day of the Sabbath, and we shouldnโ€™t be out there doing all that.โ€

Fellow challenger Allen Alsbrooks, however, highlighted a rare yet cogent problem with the religious argument as he expressed his support for the brunch ordinance.

โ€œIf weโ€™re going to sell alcohol at 10 a.m. on Saturdays โ€” my Sabbath โ€” why donโ€™t they sell it on Sundays?โ€ said Alsbrooks, who is Jewish.

The third challenger, Brooke Powell, said heโ€™d personally vote no, too.

โ€œHowever, itโ€™s not my decision โ€” itโ€™s the people in the town, the people who vote, the people who pay the taxes,โ€ Powell said. โ€œIf they think that itโ€™s best for the town, Iโ€™m all for it.โ€

Aldermen Davis and Eveland declined to give their opinions on the proposed brunch ordinance, citing the fact that they will likely have to vote on the issue in an upcoming meeting.

While the utility of a brunch ordinance in Maggie Valley is still questionable, it does carry with it economic development ramifications; those ramifications, however, are not quite the tonic Maggieโ€™s sagging economy needs.

Nor is a revitalized Ghost Town in the Sky, according to candidates.

โ€œItโ€™s a lost cause,โ€ Ketchum said of the shuttered mountaintop amusement park currently listed for nearly $6 million. โ€œWe need other things here besides that.โ€

โ€œGhost Town is no longer, and will one day probably be something else,โ€ said Powell.

โ€œIโ€™m not waking up in the morning, praying and hoping something happens at Ghost Town,โ€ Eveland said. โ€œAs a business owner who is looking at tourism and the local economy, we certainly would love to have something move in to Ghost Town that is tourism-related.โ€

Eveland also said heโ€™d have no problem if the property was redeveloped as residential.

โ€œAs long as the land is developed and used properly, it will benefit the town.โ€

Alsbrooks took a similar view of Ghost Townโ€™s potential role in Maggie Valley.

โ€œTo say thatโ€™s the only draw we have in Maggie Valley, thatโ€™s wrong,โ€ he said. โ€œWe have plenty of other things to do to keep people active.โ€

But replacing the draw that once was Ghost Town is still the subject of much speculation.

โ€œMaggie Valley is the ideal location for a convention center,โ€ Davis said, adding that although thereโ€™s not enough room for one up on Buck Mountain, the town could benefit immensely from one, or from increased use of the Eagles Nest facility on Soco Road.

The tourism-based economy in Maggie Valley by far collects the lionโ€™s share of room occupancy tax revenue, so the work of the Haywood County Tourism Development Authority means more in Maggie than in most county municipalities; Eveland is the townโ€™s representative on the TDA board, and serves as its finance chair.

As such heโ€™s party to discussions within the TDA of reorganizing the committee structure and possibly reevaluating spending priorities.

โ€œThe last several years weโ€™ve been making changes as to what we spend, and how we spend,โ€ Eveland said. โ€œA lot of the monies being spent two, three, five years ago just werenโ€™t generating the type of interest [we want].โ€

Aside from differences over the brunch ordinance, there wasnโ€™t a lot of contention from the challengers.

โ€œI have a great amount of respect for Nathan Clark, the town manager,โ€ Powell said, adding that he couldnโ€™t think of any poor decisions the current town board had made.ย  โ€œHe knows this town up and down and Iโ€™m glad heโ€™s in charge of it.โ€

โ€œThe best thing that weโ€™ve done is hire Chief Gilliland,โ€ Eveland said, referring to the townโ€™s news police chief.

But Davis said the best thing heโ€™s seen over the past two years is how much less drama there is.

โ€œIโ€™ve been on the board for two years, and the most amazing thing for me during that two years is the number of times that the board voted unanimously,โ€ Davis said. โ€œThere have been very few times weโ€™ve had split votes. Part of the reason is when Nathan or the mayor presents something, they will give the pros and the cons and weโ€™ll discuss them, listen to each other. That way instead of choosing up sides and fighting it out, we have the best thinking of the total board as a result.โ€