Archived Opinion

Another view on abortion

Another view on abortion

To the Editor:

I want to respond to a few points that Dr. Norman Hoffman made in his Opinion piece, “A modest proposal to eliminate abortions,” in the July 6 issue.  I will brush aside his “modest proposal” of giving reversible vasectomies to post-pubertal boys, because it is anything but modest.   

I am pro-life or anti-abortion, in Dr. Hoffman’s terms.  That places me in the movement that, according to Dr. Hoffman, “… never was and is not all about the ‘sanctity’ of human life,” and has “never shown interest in life post-birth.”  

He is right about me: I haven’t treated life as sacred as I should, nor have I cared enough about life post-birth (save my own life). I am a hypocrite. But there are better examples.   

There are famous anti-abortionists, like Pope Francis, Mahatma Gandhi, Mother Teresa, and Eunice Kennedy Shriver (sister of JFK; founder of Special Olympics) who certainly care or cared about human life after birth. And then there are hospitals and orphanages and day care centers run by Catholics and other anti-abortion religionists, all of which exist for people who have been born.    

Moreover, there are non-religious who are against abortion, like the late atheist Christopher Hitchens, and there are real organizations out there like Feminists for Life, and Democrats for Life, all of whom care about the rights of people, whose motivations are not only “… based on politics and power related to women.” 

 What have we anti-abortionists caused? Dr. Hoffman implies that we are responsible for the U.S. having the highest maternal death rate and the third-highest infant mortality rate among developed countries. Let us recall that these horrible statistics accrued while Roe v. Wade was in place. I am not arguing correlation is causation, but correlation is something. Germany officially outlaws abortion, yet it has one of the lowest maternal death rates and infant mortality rates in the world. 

It is true that some states, like Georgia, have passed fetal heartbeat laws, making abortion illegal after about six weeks, the time when a fetal heartbeat can be detected. Many women do not even know they are pregnant at six weeks. But compare Georgia’s law to the law in Germany. Abortion is illegal in Germany — that is modern Germany. There was a certain German government in the 1940s that made it very legal for certain non-Aryans.  

Lastly, we talk of rights, yet do the unborn have none?  I think they do, and so do most other people.     

In sum, I wish that Dr. Hoffman had used restraint in his characterization of anti-abortionists. Those who oppose abortion are not all about power or about taking away rights, but they are against what seems to them a practice so horrific that is should not be permitted, or at least greatly restricted. And they are not responsible for high maternal death rates and high infant mortality, nor are they indifferent to life post-birth.   

Steven S. Crider


Leave a comment


  • There is so much passion about abortions. Here is what I think.
    First, who is better to determine when they are ready to have a baby? The government or the woman who is pregnant. I say the woman. Everyone, especially Republicans all shout about less government control, yet they are in our bedrooms... trying to control the trajectory of a woman's life... parent or non-parent. Personally I think the decision is between me and my doctor and my God. It's not so much about abortion as it is about my choice.
    It must be about freedom of choice. If you talk to anyone at DSS or DCS you will discover how many children are here in need of families. Basically, mind your own business.

    posted by Cameron

    Monday, 08/08/2022

  • Abortion is technically illegal in Germany, but not punishable and obtainable without reason before 12 weeks.

    posted by Correction

    Friday, 08/05/2022

  • Thank you for this thoughtful response to the glib opinion published on July 6. We all have the right to determine if we are ready to start a family. If we are not, we should not engage in acts that could end in pregnancy. That is our window of discretion. Once a new human life has entered the picture, the concept of individual rights must extend to all individuals present. Including the very present, as yet unborn.

    posted by Linda

    Thursday, 08/04/2022

  • There are so many ways to avoid pregnancy before and after it occurs. So many options of contraceptives to use both before and after sexual intercourse. What is wrong with these women? Abortion is in my opinion is just a very poor form of birth control.

    posted by Lucille Josephs

    Wednesday, 08/03/2022

  • The author can think what he likes and share his thoughts. But, and i repeat but he cannot and should never determine what someone else does with their health, pregnancy and family. That is total overreach and taking away our rights.

    posted by Ronald Robinson

    Wednesday, 08/03/2022

Smokey Mountain News Logo
Go to top
Payment Information


At our inception 20 years ago, we chose to be different. Unlike other news organizations, we made the decision to provide in-depth, regional reporting free to anyone who wanted access to it. We don’t plan to change that model. Support from our readers will help us maintain and strengthen the editorial independence that is crucial to our mission to help make Western North Carolina a better place to call home. If you are able, please support The Smoky Mountain News.

The Smoky Mountain News is a wholly private corporation. Reader contributions support the journalistic mission of SMN to remain independent. Your support of SMN does not constitute a charitable donation. If you have a question about contributing to SMN, please contact us.