Archived Opinion

Time for a little less gun loving

Time for a little less gun loving

“Hollywood and video games glorify violence while those with mental illnesses remain untreated.“ 

Those are the words of Chuck Edwards, who most likely is the man who will be the new congressman for the 11th District after the election in November. He mouthed those words recently in response to the question of what needs to be done to prevent school shootings like the recent one in Uvalde, Texas. 

Based on his response, Mr. Edwards evidently thinks there would be none of these shootings if we just get those violent images out of the heads of mentally ill people, who we should already know about because we’ve somehow screened, identified and “treated” them, thus rendering them harmless. He didn’t mention at all, however, the possibility that easy access to semi-automatic rifles and such might play at least some role in the level of carnage these mentally deranged types are able to inflict within the space of minutes …. or even seconds.

Neither did he mention, as have many Republican politicians across the nation, the absolute necessity of arming school teachers (just in case a random “crazy” avoids early detection, I suppose). But I’m guessing Mr. Edwards would support that strategy, too, because it just makes sense to some folks to get more guns in the hands of “good guys” … like some of the dearly loved and respected teachers who worked with me at Central Elementary back in the day, I’m sure. (If you’re a Central grad, or former parent, you probably have an idea of some of the teachers I’m thinking about.)

I can close my eyes and still see those wonderful women in action as they interacted with the children in their care — children who loved coming to school and who thrived in our school because of the positive, supportive, and nurturing atmosphere their teachers created. And by adding to my mental picture a loaded gun riding on those ladies’ hips as they interacted with students … well … my heart is simply “warmed” by the very thought. The Beatles got it right, you know, happiness really is a warm gun.

All sarcasm aside, I know a lot of decent people who get pleasure from using their guns safely and responsibly, and guns certainly don’t have to be instruments of the kind of horror and pain we see too often these days. But I have to ask if there might not be such a thing as being just a little too “happy” about guns in America today.

Related Items

We have almost 260 million adults (18 and older) in the U.S., and we have almost 400 million guns (that we’re aware of) in circulation. That’s an awful lot of potential “happiness” to be found in America. So, is it not possible that the easy availability of guns is, in fact, a significant PART of the problem? I mean, fantasizing about mayhem while watching a movie or while playing a video game may not be healthy, but being able to walk into a gunstore right after turning 18, and buying — without any questions asked — two semi-automatic rifles and 300-plus rounds of ammunition can obviously have immediate and horrible consequences.

Regulating gun sales by requiring background checks and setting reasonable standards for ownership (e.g., 21 years old instead of 18, required training, licensure renewed every 6-8 years, maybe) is not the same as banning guns. It’s not a “slippery slope” to destroying the Second Amendment, either. It’s just common sense in a nation awash in guns so powerful and ammunition so deadly that our Founding Fathers could never have even imagined such things. 

Sure, responsible gun owners might have to go through a few extra steps before purchasing a weapon if reasonable regulations are enacted. But what responsible person wouldn’t be willing to endure just a little inconvenience if by doing so he or she was helping keep deadly weapons out of the hands of those who have no business even touching a gun?

Maybe Mr. Edwards could open his mind just a bit to consider implementing reasonable regulatory standards as another part of a meaningful response to these senseless and heartbreaking shootings. I hope he will.

John Sanderson is a former principal at Central Elementary School in Waynesville.

Leave a comment

10 comments

  • Lucille Josephs, you bot! How I have missed reading your nonsense. So good to see you here providing your asinine commentary. Still waiting for you to write your own editorial. Oh wait, but you are a bot! Right? Who do you work for?

    posted by Teri D

    Friday, 06/10/2022

  • The retired local principal is a man I trust for guidance about weapons legislation that Congress must pass.

    Heartbreakingly (literally), a poll out yesterday reveals that 44 percent of Republicans believe that school mass murders are 'the price of freedom' to own WMDs.

    From the bumper stickers I see around Haywood County, it seems that too many local people belligerently endorse letting children be blown to bits so they can own an AR-15 at age 18. (What or whom they fear is a mystery.) As Mr. Sanderson points out, no argument to continue having loopholes in background checks and red flag laws holds water. Nor do any of the other excuses; they are part of the weapons industry's decades-long campaign of "disinformation"--the new word for what we used to call Lies.

    posted by Mary Curry

    Tuesday, 06/07/2022

  • If the massacres we see in Uvalde and Parkland and Newtown and Blacksburg and Santa Fe and Las Vegas and Orlando, and the daily drumbeat of domestic violence, drug violence, gang violence, and just what my mama would have called "plain old meanness," are the necessary price we as a society must pay for "freedom," then conservatives need to make that case.

    posted by Kevin Brock

    Monday, 06/06/2022

  • The problem is not guns. It's hearts without God, homes without discipline, families without two loving parents, courts without justice, politicians hating America.

    posted by Earl

    Friday, 06/03/2022

  • Tried to answer you Mr. Earl but my answer was taken down.

    posted by Leslie

    Friday, 06/03/2022

  • Well Jimmy Earl, lets start with no Fathers, bullied in school, on and off psychotropic meds....

    posted by Lucille Josephs

    Friday, 06/03/2022

  • Please, @Leslie, enlighten us? What's the "constant in almost all of these shootings besides guns?" and how is that relevant?

    posted by Jimmy Earl

    Friday, 06/03/2022

  • Let me think for a moment. What is the other constant in almost all of these shootings besides guns? See if you can come up with the answer. Maybe there-in lies the problem.

    posted by Leslie

    Friday, 06/03/2022

  • You sound like a classic FUDD with your comments Mr. Rusty. (FUDD definition: a person who typically only owns guns for hunting or shotgun sports and does not truly believe in the true premise of the second amendment.)

    posted by Lucille Josephs

    Friday, 06/03/2022

  • You make a lot of assumptions Mr. Sanderson based on your emotional opinions. There are plenty of gun laws and plenty of gun regulation already, especially in such dangerous urban environments like Baltimore and Chicago to name a few. Has that stopped the violence? The Second Amendment was designed to protect citizens from tyranny and overreach by a government and people in power who think like you. It is absolute, just like all the other Amendments in our Constitutional Republic.

    posted by Lucille Josephs

    Friday, 06/03/2022

Smokey Mountain News Logo
SUPPORT THE SMOKY MOUNTAIN NEWS AND
INDEPENDENT, AWARD-WINNING JOURNALISM
Go to top
Payment Information

/

At our inception 20 years ago, we chose to be different. Unlike other news organizations, we made the decision to provide in-depth, regional reporting free to anyone who wanted access to it. We don’t plan to change that model. Support from our readers will help us maintain and strengthen the editorial independence that is crucial to our mission to help make Western North Carolina a better place to call home. If you are able, please support The Smoky Mountain News.

The Smoky Mountain News is a wholly private corporation. Reader contributions support the journalistic mission of SMN to remain independent. Your support of SMN does not constitute a charitable donation. If you have a question about contributing to SMN, please contact us.