To the Editor:

Pursuant to the article regarding Shining Rock Classical Academy that was published in last week’s edition, as well as the introduction of additional articles to follow, I would like to offer a positive parent statement. I ask that you consider publishing both positive and negative parental perspectives in your upcoming articles. My hope is that other parents will reach out with positive statements, although human nature often inclines us to find the negatives.  

At SRCA our children have thrived, we adore the teachers, the staff, and administration. This year I have watched my four children grow immensely. They have learned from teachers who value their academic advancement, as well as their personal growth and character. I have witnessed staff and administration care for my children, and at the same time lovingly intercede in moments when they were not making the best decisions. I appreciate creative approaches to discipline at Shining Rock, such as physical movement (walking laps), creativity (a poster presentation about poor choices), or reflection (a good talk with the SRO). 

My oldest was suspended three times this year for his poor choices. This perspective is coming from a mom of kids who are not “perfect.” Yet, never did we experience anything inappropriate. Two of my four children are in class with the parents who made statements. Naturally, I questioned my children, “are you afraid of Mr. Joshua Morgan, have you ever seen him touch a child in a scary way or be rough.” Each of my four children said “no.” They have never experienced Mr. Morgan display these accused behaviors.  

Prior to the printing of your article, I was aware of the letters which were presented to the board last week, and I had a chance to read them all before they were submitted. I found much of the information to be subjective in nature, but this is often the case in this type of situation. Do I believe there are some issues at SRCA? Absolutely. 

There will always be areas in which parents, including myself, may have frustrations or concerns. In February, I was quoted by The Mountaineer following the SRCA board meeting, in which I publicly questioned the board’s lack of integrity and clarity regarding Mr. Duncan’s firing, and the choice to do this without all members present. I believe the board needs to be not only evaluated but revised. Increased stakeholders, diversity, and community leaders added to the board would certainly allow for new perspectives and decisions. I know as an educator and a registered nurse that those of us in public service are rarely thanked for the work we do. It is often the slight indifferences that are magnified in light of all the good. Leaders must make decisions that are best for the entire community that they serve. Often those decisions are not easy, nor are the details behind those decisions able to be disclosed. While clarity is crucial to trust, part of choosing a school of choice is indeed choosing to trust the leadership who are in the trenches every day. 

Thank you for considering my statements. 

Alyson Weimar

Maggie Valley