haywoodA dozen hotels, motels and tourist accommodations in Haywood County will have to open their books to auditors in coming months to prove they arenโ€™t pocketing some of the room taxes they collect.

Overnight accommodations tack a 4 percent tax onto room bills and are supposed to turn it over monthly to the Haywood County Tourism Development Authority.ย 

But thereโ€™s never been a mechanism to know whether accommodations turn over all the tax they collect.ย 

โ€œIf they are collecting it and not paying it, thatโ€™s fraud,โ€ explained Lynn Collins, executive director of the tourism authority.

Since itโ€™s based on the honor system โ€” lodging owners simply send in a check for what is collected each month โ€” tourism authority members suspect some may be under-reporting how much business they do and pocketing some of the tax instead of sending it in.

โ€œIf we donโ€™t have at least some kind of audit, there are a handful of people who would take advantage of that, knowing nobody will ever check,โ€ said Mike Eveland, a tourism authority member with the Maggie Valley Inn. โ€œIf we donโ€™t have this in place then we are pretty much leaving it wide open.โ€

The tourism agency is hiring an auditing firm to check accommodationsโ€™ books, at a cost of $400 per audit. Up to a dozen will be selected a year.

Tammy Wight, a tourism board member who is against the idea, has raised concerns over the idea.

โ€œI donโ€™t see how this is going to be fair,โ€ said Wight, who is also the president of the Maggie Valley Area Lodging Association and the owner of the Clarketon Motel.

The audit wonโ€™t be random. It will target specific lodging businesses, and thatโ€™s one of Wightโ€™s concerns.ย 

The lodging business is competitive, and many of the tourism board members are in the industry themselves. ย 

โ€œI asked how we would know who to audit and the comment that was made was โ€˜We know, people say things.โ€™ I donโ€™t think we should base an audit off of hearsay,โ€ Wight said.

Eveland said criteria will be used to determine what accommodations are chosen.

But that criteria is still being developed.

โ€œWe will have a process for how we are going to pick and choose,โ€ Collins said.

Thereโ€™s around 300 lodging operations in the county โ€” from large hotels to private vacation homes โ€” and only 3 percent will be audited a year. The odds would be slim under a random audit that the real offenders ever get chosen.

So the audit will target accommodations with suspect numbers that donโ€™t seem to jive, or those that are routinely delinquent in their remittance of the room tax, according to discussion at the tourism authorityโ€™s recent meeting on the issue.

For example, a motel that doesnโ€™t send in any room taxes during winter months, claiming it was closed, yet has comments on Trip Advisor from people who stayed there during the winter, would be a prime candidate for auditing.ย 

The tourism authority will contract with Tax Management Associates out of Charlotte to perform the audits. The same firm was used for an audit a few years ago to find under-the-radar vacation rentals that werenโ€™t charging the tax.

The discovery netted more than 50 new accounts, mostly among second-home owners who rent out their mountain houses a few weeks of the year.ย 

Collectively, vacation houses, rental cabins and villas account for half the tax thatโ€™s brought in each year, Collins said.ย 

An indirect benefit of that audit was the โ€œpublicity that it generated from people who did not realize they were supposed to be collecting the occupancy tax,โ€ said Lyndon Lowe of Twinbrook Resorts in Maggie Valley, who chairs the tourism authority.